Justice Department lawyers are preparing to ask a federal judge to put a hold on his ruling this week that blocks awarding further federal grants for stem-cell research.
The federal government intends to appeal the ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth. But an administration official says government lawyers will also argue that the injunction imposed by the judge will seriously jeopardize ongoing stem-cell research. Justice Department lawyers are now gathering affidavits to support that claim, the official says.
Groups opposed to research on stem cells obtained from human embryos have praised the judge’s order. Americans United for Life called it a sensible ruling — one that “reconfirms what we already knew, that administration policy is in violation of the law.”
Text continues after Pictures of the Week gallery:
Pics Of The Week: 08.23.10
But some legal scholars are questioning Judge Lamberth’s conclusion that the Obama administration’s policy violates a federal law, one that says no federal funds can be used for research “in which” human embryos are destroyed. Because obtaining the stem cells destroys embryos, the judge said, it follows that subsequent research “is clearly research in which an embryo is destroyed.”
But an expert on health-care law argues that the congressional ban does not prohibit federal funding of research that is “related to, associated with, has a connection to, or builds upon the fruits of” embryo destruction.
“It only prohibits funding of research in which embryos are destroyed,” says UCLA Professor Russell Korobkin.